I can definitely see a use for Library Thing in my life. Put in a book I like, get out a list of suggested reading. I could catalog my books which appeals to that place in my heart that wants to be organized but doesn’t know how. I see a point for this tool, BUT I see more of a use for conversations, face to face, about books and reading. I would rather go to Natalie, our elementary librarian, for a suggestion of a book to read aloud to my class. She knows so much about books AND (this is the really important part) she knows the kids in my class. I don’t think Library Thing is as helpful or as social as Librarian or Bookgroup or Friend Who Likes Similar Books. I like the conversation that goes with suggesting books to each other – the tangents onto books you’ve both read, the excitement about a book you’d really like to recommend. I see how Library Thing, and other social sites are social (and helpful and cool and fun,) but I don’t see how they could ever be as social as actually talking to real people without a computer, a router, a network, and a website in between. Sorry for sounding like such a negative person, but I’ve been thinking a lot about social/emotional education recently and how important that is for 5 and 6 year olds, and by extension, everyone. Life is about the meaningful connections you make with other people. I guess if you can make meaningful connections with people via the internet, go for it.
I do think it’s really interesting to check out how people are using the Web 2.0 to create really specialized virtual communities. If you are obsessed with a particular book, you can go online and find people who are also obsessed with that book, even though you might not know anyone who likes that book. You can talk about your passion, ask questions, and presto, other like-minded people will respond (you hope). It’s neat that the Web (2.0) is becoming such an interactive entity.
Tags: books, library thing, literature, web 2.0